![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjej3cKwdMlYyPPifz715buTsqtCAqxHAZ_KnDvXNh86i3sJfC_O77UKuWIOZnn6MLFW1gACnWgB5W08-olLEWldxKBPRi7_Ya-_t2SrCDMjNddTtNmcCwM6KY_77H2EQ1rMg4kGS4kLdg/s320/outputplot_logarithmic.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoFwf7aTeAVEDR0mary5Hx6tmNzOoBgRykCCwy_AFd01Vv27qppFy5BnBQlC6QHiBBcY2wsKF8VWZNTABmZ-4wjmqxCi0i7pD5jGNNEp2s7SRyAoekJ8I0y6izqq1PCrymw964iFpE6E8/s320/outputplot_Y-5.png)
Simulations to obtain best u-v coverage possible with 4 antennae
Onkar has some preliminary results from his u-v plane coverage simulations. Here are mouth-watering diagrams first.
Onkar generates the positions of antennas using some logic. This is independent of other details. His top image (u-v coverage of 6 antennas) was made using a logarithmic spiral distribution of 4 antennae. The second image was created when 4 antennae were used in a Y-shaped array, like the VLA.
His (possibly) best result is kept for the last, when is that, Onkar?